AVG. Request for inspection and erasure of personal data. Request under Art. 82 AVG for compensation for damages. Track change ex art. 69 Rv and referral to subdistrict court ex art. 71 Rv. (Machine translated) https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2022:1351

Civil courtroom. Interlocutory decision. Art 35 UAVG request, request for inspection and information pursuant to Art 15 and 26 (2) AVG and for fulfillment of information obligations Art 13 and 14 AVG.  Compliance with these obligations can be requested in this case under an Art 35 UAVG. (Machine translated) https:

Request to remove BKR codes granted. Balance of interests. Applicants have always complied with agreed payment schedule, have repaid the full amount of credit and in addition amount of interest, financial situation of applicants is stable. (Machine translated) https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:8010

Damages of 250 euros, under Article 82 AVG, in connection with unlawful processing of personal data, by circulating Excell list containing sensitive personal data (Machine translated) https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:RBROT:2022:1419

Grant request to remove BKR registration. Small amount of arrears, arrears due to not careful administration, registration impedes purchase/rent of home. The applicant's interest is more important. (Machine translated) https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2021:6564

Request for removal of BKR registration granted. Sufficiently demonstrated that arrears were related to circumstances at the time, financially stable now, full amount repaid. (Machine translated) https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:3420

Infringement of IP rights by illegal downloading and uploading via BitTorrent using an Internet connection of Ziggo. Ziggo is not ordered to forward warning letters from Brein to the customers in question, because it does not (yet) have a license to do so from the Personal Data Authority. If Ziggo

Artt. 5, 6 (1), 12, 17 and 21 AVG. No unlawful processing by BKR so Art. 17 (1) (d) AVG lacks application. BKR had to consider and decide objection under Art. 21 AVG. Granting subsidiary removal request. (Machine translated) https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2022:126

Claim of plaintiff rejected. No infringement of portrait rights as the Claimant has given both implicit and explicit consent to the manner of use of his portrait. Nor any violation of the AVG. (Machine translated) https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:RBROT:2021:13048

claim annulment of settlement agreement and damages for invasion of privacy (inspection of business emails). (Machine translated) https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2021:3862